Update from Cutting edge ministries:
I. Just as we warned during the last term of the Bill Clinton Administration, the Federal Government has militarized local and state police forces!
--
DO NOT TRUST THE POLICE!!!!! THEY ARE NOT ON YOUR SIDE!
--
Officials used the 'War On Terror' as their 'severe crisis' which allowed them to seize control and so arm police forces that they are now para-military rather than normal police forces.
--
NEWS BRIEF: "How the War on Terror Has Militarized the Police", The Atlantic, November 7, 2011
--
"Over the past 10 years, law enforcement officials have begun to look and act more and more like soldiers. Here's why we should be alarmed. At around 9:00 a.m. on May 5, 2011, officers with the Pima County, Arizona, Sheriff's Department's Special Weapons and Tactics (S.W.A.T.) team surrounded the home of 26-year-old José Guerena, a former U.S. Marine and veteran of two tours of duty in Iraq, to serve a search warrant for narcotics. As the officers approached, Guerena lay sleeping in his bedroom after working the graveyard shift at a local mine. When his wife Vanessa woke him up, screaming that she had seen a man outside the window pointing a gun at her, Guerena grabbed his AR-15 rifle, instructed Vanessa to hide in the closet with their four year old son, and left the bedroom to investigate."
--
"Within moments, and without Guerena firing a shot or even switching his rifle off of 'safety' he lay dying, his body riddled with 60 bullets. A subsequent investigation revealed that the initial shot that prompted the S.W.A.T. team barrage came from a S.W.A.T. team gun, not Guerena's. Guerena, reports later revealed, had no criminal record, and no narcotics were found at his home."
--
In addition to arming police forces with incredible firepower, the Federal Government has also trained them to shoot first and ask questions later. Can you imagine that, without receiving fire from the victim, these police fired so many times that they actually hit him 60 times? How many rounds did they fire off? If they hit a body hidden inside the house that many times, they must have fired hundreds of rounds of ammunition.
--
These are the actions of a dictatorship. But, of course, a dictatorship is what the secret societies like the Bilderbergers are planning once the world moves into the New World Order.
--
Now, let us return to our featured article.
"Sadly, the Guerenas are not alone; in recent years we have witnessed a proliferation in incidents of excessive, military-style force by police S.W.A.T. teams, which often make national headlines due to their sheer brutality. Why has it become routine for police departments to deploy black-garbed, body-armored S.W.A.T. teams for routine domestic police work? "
--
The answer is that the Federal Government has taken full advantage of the domestic terror produced by the attacks of 9/11. Officials up and down the Federal Government have forced changes in the guise of protecting us from terrorism that they would never be able to make otherwise.
--
But, of course, this is the essence of the "Dialectic Struggle" tactic: create a crisis and then step in with your solution.
--
I am amazed at the tremendous mileage the Government has gotten from the attacks of 9/11, as officials from Bush to Obama have been able to get tough dictatorial laws passed by Congress. History will record 9/11/2001 as the true "Day of Infamy", the first day of the end of America's Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.
--
AMERICA TAKE NOTICE! Unconstitutional arrests are taking place across the country of people who owe small debts, and collection companies are making huge profits. Here's what's happening. People are secretly being arrested throughout the nation for owing minor credit card debts. People are not being served notice that they are being sued, then when they don't show up for court, a warrant is issued for their arrest....and the debtors don't even know it!!!
--
You committed no crime, but an officer is knocking on your door. More Americans are surprised to find themselves being locked up over debts.
--
Take Joy Uhlmeyer (BELOW LEFT), who had been arrested while driving home to Richfield, Minn., after a visit with her mother. Uhlmeyer spent a night in a holding cell. Then, handcuffed in a squad car, she was taken to Minneapolis for booking. No one had an answer as to why she was arrested. Finally, after 16 hours in limbo, jail officials fingerprinted Uhlmeyer and explained she owed a credit card company less than $300. Uhlmeyer spent a sleepless night in a frigid Anoka County holding cell, her hands tucked under her armpits for warmth. Finally, after hours in limbo, jail officials fingerprinted Uhlmeyer and explained her offense — missing a court hearing over an unpaid debt. “They have no right to do this to me,” said the 57-year-old patient care advocate, her voice as soft as a whisper. “Not for a stupid credit card.”
--
It’s not a crime to owe money, and debtors’ prisons were abolished in the United States in the 19th century. But people are routinely being thrown in jail for failing to pay debts. In Minnesota, which has some of the most creditor-friendly laws in the country, the use of arrest warrants against debtors has jumped 60 percent over the past four years, with 845 cases in 2009, a Star Tribune analysis of state court data has found.
--
Not every warrant results in an arrest, but in Minnesota many debtors spend up to 48 hours in cells with criminals. Consumer attorneys say such arrests are increasing in many states, including Arkansas, Arizona and Washington.
--
Last spring, Deborah Poplawski (BELOW RIGHT) was digging for coins to feed a parking meter when she saw the flashing lights of a police car. She was arrested, not for parking illegally, but for a small credit card debt. How much? $250!
--
Thanks to interest and fees, Poplawski was on the hook for a lot more than her original debt. Less than a month earlier, she learned by chance that she had an outstanding warrant. A debt buyer had sued her, but she says nobody served her with court documents. She spent nearly 25 hours in the Hennepin County jail. The judge told her to fill out a form listing her assets. A debt collection firm used this information to seize her bank account.
--
How often are debtors arrested across the country? No one can say. No national statistics are kept, and the practice is largely unnoticed. "MY SUSPICION IS THE DEBT COLLECTION INDUSTRY DOES NOT WANT THE WORLD TO KNOW THESE ARRESTS ARE HAPPENING BECAUSE THE PRACTICE WOULD BE WIDELY CONDEMNED," said Robert Hobbs of the National Consumer Law Center in Boston
--
Whether a debtor is locked up depends largely on where the person lives, because enforcement is inconsistent. Arrests are increasing in certain states, driven by a bad economy, high consumer debt and a growing industry that buys debt and employs every means available to collect. In one state with particularly creditor-friendly laws, debtor arrests have increased sharply.
--
In Illinois and southwest Indiana , some judges jail debtors for missing court-ordered debt payments. In extreme cases, people stay in jail until they raise a minimum payment. In January, a judge sentenced an Illinois man "to indefinite incarceration" until he came up with this amount toward a lumber yard debt.
--
It's now of utmost importance that we NOT let America become a Police State where the police can do anything they please. The police routinely violate people's rights. They lie to people they are trying to arrest on a constant basis. People may wonder "are police allowed to lie to me?"
Yes. It's a legally accepted and highly effective interrogation technique to lie to you and present false evidence in order to elicit a confession. This is particularly common during interrogations in which officers might tell you that "your friend already gave you up, so you might as well come clean." DON'T ADMIT YOU OWE MONEY TO A CREDITOR OR TO A POLICEMAN!!!!
--
The best defense against these manipulative tricks is to avoid saying anything to police without first speaking with an attorney. Use the magic words "I'm going to remain silent. I would like to see a lawyer." Repeat, if necessary.
--
On a related topic, it's commonly believed that undercover police have to reveal their identity when asked. This is false. Police may lie....and do on a constant basis.
--
Determine if You're Free to Go. Unless you're detained or arrested, you may terminate the encounter anytime. But don't wait for the officer to dismiss you. Ask if you're free to go.
--
For example, if an officer threatens to call in a K-9 unit if you refuse a search, you should ask "Officer, are you detaining me, or am I free to go?"
--
Not only can this line can help withdraw you from an encounter, it also deflects any of the officer's probing questions or threats. So if an officer says "If you cooperate with me, everything will go easy for you." You may respond by saying either "Officer, I don't consent to any searches" or "Officer, am I free to go?"
--
If the officer lets you leave (and by our constitution he has too), do so immediately. If the officer's answer is unclear, or if he asks additional questions, persist by repeating "Officer, am I free to go?"
--
How does the PATRIOT Act , War on Terror impact your rights during police encounters?
There are many reasons to be concerned about the unconstitutional impact of the PATRIOT Act and War on Terror. But as far as the powers of your local sheriff or state highway patrol are concerned, they have had zero impact.
--
That being said, be mindful that some police officers may use the threat of terrorism to trick citizen's into believing they have enhanced search and interrogation powers. For example, police may justify a routine traffic search request by claiming "I'm just searching for guns and explosives". This is simply a cynical way to trick citizens into compliance....and a violation of your 4th Amendment rights of unreasonable searches.
--
Don't fall for it. You have the right to refuse search requests by asking "Officer, am I free to go." Repeat if necessary.
--
Don't think for a minute that the police are on your side. Let's read this statement from a former NYPD:
--
**When Officer Adil Polanco dreamed of becoming a cop, it was out of a desire to help people not, he says, to harass them.
“I’m not going to keep arresting innocent people, I’m not going to keep searching people for no reason, I’m not going to keep writing people for no reason, I’m tired of this,” said Adil Polanco, an NYPD Officer.
He claims Precinct Commanders relentlessly pressure cops on the street to make more arrests, and give out more summonses.
“Our primary job is not to help anybody, our primary job is not to assist anybody, our primary job is to get those numbers and come back with them?” said Officer Polanco.
Eyewitness News asked, “Are you telling me they’re stopping people for no reason, is that what you’re saying?”
“We are stopping kids walking upstairs to their house, stopping kids going to the store, young adults. In order to keep the quota,” answered Officer Polanco.**
h1. THE REAL ANSWER IS YES! THEY DO STOP PEOPLE FOR NO REASON!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The author of this article had trouble with the Greenwood Village police department in Colorado and was ticketed for possible "terrorism" by hanging out by a public fountain. The officer even used that word when I spoke with him. He said they were on alert for people poisoning public places....GIVE ME A BREAK! This was nothing but police "profiling" In other words RACISM! The complaint was from an officer Anthony Laska. I think his first name is Anthony.... His writing looks like that of a six year old so I can't make out what his first name really is. But my research has found him...and he now hides in Alaska... Here is a photocopy of the ticket this fool gave me before he even did an investigation. (BELOW)
--
Now, here is the BAD COP, (Anthony Laska) that actually issued me a ticket and the moron who is dumb enough to create a facebook page....
--
--
Here is a pic from officer Laska's facebook page:
--
And here's another: Apparently his wife's name is Michelle Corey Chambers...What kind of a man put's his wife's name on a facebook page? Especially someone of questionable character like Anthony Laska?
--
Here is a statement from the Colorado Greenwood Village Police Department from their website: "The Greenwood Village policing philosophy is based on the principle of providing safety in our community, crime prevention and solving neighborhood problems."
--
BS!!!!!! Well, first off, the Greenwood Village department pulls people over frequently on the highway and endangers everyone. I see this constantly. Also, they pull over motorists for hours on end into the parking lots of private businesses for their "speed traps" that the taxpayers pay for. I've seen this first hand at the Bank of The West private parking on Quebec street. I went to work at 9:00am and there was a policeman pulling people over there. At lunchtime..12:00 noon, he was still at it. If I was the owner of Bank of The West, I would come out and tell the officer to stop pulling people over in my parking lot and to run his speed trap elsewhere.
--
The complaint issued for me even admits that "there was no arrest" and that there was "no fingerprinting" and there was "no photographs" In other words...."There is no case"! But, because I was "profiled as a terrorist" I was called in. Officer Laska, even initially called a number that was not mine trying to find me and threatened to "Have my car picked up" unless I came in and talked to them. First off, officer Laska was and is a lying scumbag....He could NOT have my car picked up... for ANY reason.
--
That's against my 4th amendment rights. He's either lying to try to get me to come down to the station or ignorant of the Constitution (or both). Second, was obviously profiling and is using threats that he couldn't follow through with to try and intimidate. When I went in to the station I saw the guy was a little runt and reminded me of the kid everyone picked on in school and now that he's a policeman, he thinks he'll now get respect....WRONG! Look at his facebook page and his favorite quote is "Google me bitch" Is this the kind of person you want in authority?
--
THIS KIND OF POLICE BS HAS GOT TO STOP! As a matter of fact, please call the Greenwood Village police in Colorado at 303-486-8248 and ask for John A. Jackson (the police chief pictured below) and ask why they waste tax payer money with useless "speed traps" Ask him why they pull people over on the highway that endangers people's lives. Then ask why they accuse regular citizens of "Terrorism" and encourage officers to make empty lying threats such as "picking my car up". It's against the law for citizens to lie to the police, but apparently they can lie and threaten all they want. Here is Jackson's picture below.
--
**Apparently he promotes and is okay with bad cops like officer Laska....Now, to be fair, he wasn't the Police Chief when I had my run in with the department.....but the speed traps (at taxpayer expense) and dangerous traffic stops on the highway continue. You can also e-mail him at: jjackson@greenwoodvillage.com or write the dept at: City of Greenwood Village • 6060 South Quebec Street • Greenwood Village, CO 80111-4591**
--
Also, don't stop at the local level. File complaints with the Attorney General on the National level too. Especially if you think you were profiled as I believe I was. Here is the address:
--
Eric H Holder Jr. Attorney General
--
950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
--
Washington D.C.
--
20530
--
(202)514-2001
--
If you live in Greenwood Village and you have been stopped without probable cause, make sure and let John A. Jackson know about it (BELOW) He may not do anything about it, but WE THE PEOPLE need to let him and all Police Chiefs across the nation know that we won't tolerate their strong arm tactics. I guarantee you, if enough complaints get filed with the Attorney General in your state.....they will start listening!!!
Remember, you don't answer to the police, they answer to you! You pay their salary! Don't put up with their intimidation tactics.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUST SAY NOTHING
--
By Dave Kopel
--
What if you've just been arrested for something which shouldn't be a crime? For instance, if a burglar breaks into your home, attacks your children and you shoot him. Should you talk to the police in detail about what happened? In a word, "No." Shut up, call the best lawyer you can find, and then continue to shut up. If you talk to the police, you will only make things worse for yourself.
--
Sociologist Richard Leo has written several articles which detail the deliberately deceptive techniques which police use to extract a confession. First of all, since 1986 the Unites States Supreme Court has required that all persons under arrest be given the Miranda warnings, so that they will know that they have a right to remain silent, and the right to a lawyer. So how do police convince a suspect to talk, even after the Miranda warning? Professor Leo explains that "police routinely deliver Miranda warnings in a perfunctory tone of voice and ritualistic behavioral manner, effectively conveying that these warnings are little more than a bureaucratic triviality." Of course, the Miranda warnings are not trivial; your liberty may hinge on heeding those warnings.
--
No matter how strong the other evidence against you, a confession will make things much worse. A confession often makes the major difference in the district attorney's willingness to prosecute the case, and his willingness to accept a plea bargain. If your confession gets before a jury, your prospects of acquittal are virtually nil. If you are foolish enough to reject the Miranda warnings, simply put, the police interrogators will attempt to deceive you into confessing. As a result of increased judicial supervision of the police, deception, rather than coercion ("the third degree") has become the norm for interrogation.
--
First of all, you will be kept in a physical environment designed to make you want to waive your rights and talk. You will most likely be kept in isolation, in a small, soundproof area. By isolating you, the interrogator attempts to instill feelings of anxiety, restlessness and self-doubt on your part. Left alone for long periods, you may think you are being ignored, and will therefore be happy to see the interrogator return. Ideally, from the interrogator's viewpoint, you will begin to develop the "Stockholm syndrome," in which persons held captive under total control begin to identify and empathize with their captors. This can occur after as few as ten minutes of isolation in captivity. While increasing your dependence, the interrogator works to build your trust by pretending that he cares about you, that he wants to hear your story, and that he understands how difficult it may be for you to talk. The interrogator works to become your only source of social reinforcement.
--
There is no law against outright lies or other deceptions on the part of police during an interrogation. Almost certainly, you will be told that the prosecutor and the judge will be more lenient if you confess. This is a complete lie. The district attorney will be more lenient if you don't confess and he can't make a strong case against you, and therefore has to settle for a plea bargain. Nothing the police promise in the interrogation room is binding on the police, much less on the district attorney. There are five "techniques of neutralization" which the interrogator may use in order to make you feel that the crime really wasn't so bad, and that it is therefore all right for you to confess. Of course the interrogator's pretense that he doesn't think the crime was serious will last only as long as necessary to obtain the confession. The first technique is called "denial of responsibility," allowing the subject to blame someone else for the offense. For example, "it was really the burglar's fault for breaking in; he's the one to blame for getting shot." (That's true, but it's you, after all, that the police are interrogating.)
--
Another technique is "denial of injury." For example, "The burglar wasn't really hurt; he walked out of the hospital two hours ago." Maybe true, maybe not. In truth, the burglar could be in intensive care and the interrogator could be laying the groundwork for a murder case against you. In the "denial of the victim" technique, the interrogator will suggest that the victim deserved what he got. "Condemnation of the condemners" is always popular. For instance, "the real problem is all those anti-gun nuts who let criminals run loose, but don't want guys like you to defend themselves." True enough, but when the policeman saying this is holding you prisoner, take his sincere expression with a large grain of salt.
--
Finally, there's the "appeal to higher loyalties" such as "What you did is a common sense thing. Regardless of some legal technicality, the most important thing is for you to protect your family. Your family comes first, right?" True again, but the man saying this wants you to confess to violating the legal technicality, so you can be prosecuted for it. A close cousin to the denial strategies are the "normalizing" techniques, in which the interrogator claims to understand that the crime was not typical behavior for the subject; "I can see that you're not a violent person. You're not a criminal. You're a tax-paying, home-owning, regular kind of guy. What happened tonight was really unusual for you, wasn't it?"
--
You have nothing to gain, and everything to lose by talking. You are not going to outsmart the interrogator. Even if you don't end up producing a full confession, you may reveal details which will help build a case against you. Most violent criminals are too stupid to read, and too lazy to pursue a time-consuming, high-precision hobby like handloading. So I'm not worried that a violent criminal will read this column, and avoid confessing to a serious crime. Anyone who does commit a violent crime should confess, since they've done something that is wrong. Too often in America, good citizens are arrested for victimless "crimes," including unjustifiable (and unconstitutional) gun regulations. The routine use of deception in order to trick good citizens into confessions is something that deserves more scrutiny than it has thus far received.
--
In the long run, routine deception by the police tears at our social fabric, and undermines the law enforcement system. The more police lie, the more skeptical juries are going to be, even when police are telling the truth. Moreover, there are about 6,000 false confessions for felonies every year in the United States. (Huff et al., "Guilty Until Proven Innocent," Crime & Delinquency, vol. 32, pages 518-44, 1986). False confessions are one of the major reasons for the conviction of innocent persons.
--
If this is happening to you, FIGHT BACK! Consult With A Consumer Attorney in Your State. Then file a complaint with the Attorney General in the state you live in. You can also contact the division of the Supreme Court in your state that handles disciplinary actions for attorney's and collection agencies to file a complaint. Your complaint is required to be kept on file. LET THE POLICE CHIEF KNOW, IN YOUR DISTRICT THAT YOU KNOW THIS IS HAPPENING AND WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS!!!!!!!!!! PEOPLE! YOU CAN'T BE PASSIVE ANYMORE! BECAUSE YOU OR A LOVED ONE CAN END UP IN JAIL! Remember, this republic is NOT run by the government or the police.....It is run by YOU! So YOU need to set the rules and don't tolerate the police state to tell you what to do.....
--
The Battlefield of Debt has moved from the phone and mailbox to police arrests and a Court of Law. To be successful, it’s best that you seek the help of a Consumer Attorney. An experienced Attorney can advise you of your Rights. The National Association of Consumer Advocates can connect you to a Consumer Attorney in your state.
--
Don’t let a “stupid credit card” get you arrested. Learn your rights, fight back! DON'T LET COLLECTION AGENCIES AND LOCAL POLICE VIOLATE YOUR BILL OF RIGHTS AND OUR CONSTITUTION! Engage the enemy of your freedoms before you and I have none. COPY AND PASTE THIS ARTICLE.......SEND IT TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS.....GET THE WORD OUT THIS IS HAPPENING! You are protected by the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act..FDCPA. If you are harassed by a collection agency, you can fight back. Near the end of the FDCPA the consequences to collection agencies who fail to adhere to this Act is spelled out in Section 813 Civil Liability. Section 813 begins by stating “Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this title with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of—” then a long list of damages is listed (we’ll get to this at the end). I just want you to be aware that collection agencies who fail to adhere to this Act can be held liable. Thanks to the FDCPA the debtor has an excellent resource of legal rights at their disposal. Make sure to check out the below website:
--
A good source on how to defend yourself from illegal activities from creditors can be found at: debtprison.net
--
Now! are you ready for what else is happening to normal citizens at airports around the nation? Look at this report by Joe Sharkey who actually experienced this:
--
On Tuesday November 2, 2010, 1:40 am EDT
--
HAVING been taught by nuns in grade school and later going through military boot camp, I have always disliked uniformed authorities shouting at me. So I was unhappy last week when some security screeners at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago started yelling.
--
“Opt out! We got an opt out!” one bellowed about me in a tone that people in my desert neighborhood in Tucson usually reserve for declaring, “Rattlesnake!”
--
Other screeners took up the “Opt out!” shout. I was marched from the metal detector lane to one of those nearby whole-body imagers, ordered to take everything out of my pockets, remove my belt and hold my possessions up high. Then I was required to stand still while I received a rough pat-down by a man whose résumé, I suspected, included experience at a state prison.
--
“Hold your pants up!” he ordered me.
--
What did I do to deserve this? Well, as I approached the checkpoints, I had two choices. One was a familiar lane with the metal detector, so I put my bag on that. To my right was a separate lane dominated with what the Transportation Security Administration initially called “whole-body imagers” but has now labeled “advanced imaging technology” units. Critics, of course, call them strip-search machines.
--
I don’t like these things, and not just because of privacy concerns or because of what some critics have asserted are radiation safety issues with some of the machines that use X-ray technology.
--
No, I don’t like the fact that I have to remove every item from every pocket, including my wallet and things as trivial as a Kleenex. You then strike a pose inside with your hands submissively held above your head, like some desperado cornered by the sheriff in a Western movie, while the see-through-clothes machine makes an image of your body.
--
The T.S.A.’s position is that anyone can “opt out” of a body scan for reasons of privacy or whatever, but will then be subjected to a thorough physical pat-down and careful search of belongings.
--
In my case, I had been routinely using a normal metal detector checkpoint, when I was ordered to switch lanes and instead go to one of the new machines. I said I would prefer not to, given that my carry-on bag, laptop and shoes were already trundling along the regular machine’s conveyor belt, out of sight. That’s when the shouting started.
--
As of Monday afternoon, the agency had not responded to several requests for comment on this. Last week, the agency did tell me that there were 317 of the advanced imaging technology machines now in use at 65 airports around the country.
--
About 500 should be online by the end of the year, the agency said, and another 500 are expected to be installed next year. Ultimately, the agency plans to have the new machines replace metal detectors at all of the roughly 2,000 airport checkpoints.
--
Meanwhile, both passengers and security screeners are making accommodations, and I acknowledge, change is a challenge. But hey, security folks, could we please start communicating better about the procedures, preferably without shouting or insulting our intelligence?
--
Bruce Delahorne, a marketing executive who flies frequently, said he was also recently going through a standard metal detector at O’Hare — no body imager in sight — when the old rules abruptly changed.
--
Mr. Delahorne said: “They had one of the T.S.A. staff announcing loudly: ‘Take everything out of your pockets. If you have a wallet, take it out. A handkerchief, out.’ I asked the guy, ‘Can you explain the reason for the new process?’ He said there was nothing new. ‘We have always done this.’ ”
--
Well, no they haven’t, as you and I and Mr. Delahorne all know. Mr. Delahorne said he thought, “O.K., I get it. This guy is reading from the card, not talking to me.”
--
So, Mr. Delahorne said, “I did what they told me to. But on the other side of the metal detector, I said to another screener, ‘Could you explain to me why the procedure is now different at this airport, like having to remove a wallet that never set off the metal detector?’ And he said, ‘No, no. The process has always been the same, at every airport.’ ”
--
Mr. Delahorne said he was perfectly willing to comply with all procedures to ensure good security. He just wondered whether some of them were being made up on the spot. “For me,” he said, “the issue is, who’s in charge here and what are the rules?”
--
AMERICA! DO YOU SEE WHAT'S GOING IN HERE! DON'T LET THIS CONTINUE!!!!!
--
---------------------------------------------------
Interesting the the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE logged on to this site:
--
**Domain Name usdoj.gov (U.S. Government)
IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
ISP US Dept of Justice
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Virginia
City : Arlington
Time of Visit Sep 9 2010 6:13:55 am
Referring URL unknown
Time Zone unknown
Visitor's Time Unknown
Visit Number 84,496**
-------------------------------------------------------
EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM;
--
