Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more proof there is they were murdered by your/our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.
If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11 but you are too lazy or fearful to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? Once again, we are NOT presenting you "conspiracy theories"....WE ARE PRESENTING YOU, CONSPIRACY FACTS!!!!!
--
For more on the truth about 9/11 visit:
--
THE 9/11 LIE
ALSO:
--
EXPLOSIVES FOUND IN WTC RESIDUE
Hummmm, wonder why the major News agencies didn't pick up this story:
--
Explosives Found in
--
World Trade Center Dust
--
Scientists Discover Both Residues
--
And Unignited Fragments
--
of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics
--
In Debris From the Twin Towers
--
EXOTIC HIGH TECH EXPLOSIVES POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED IN WORLD TRADE CENTER DUST
--
Posted on April 6, 2009
--
A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.
--
The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.
--
Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was titled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.” It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.
--
The paper ends with the statement, “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
--
Ordinary thermite burns quickly and can melt through steel, but it is not explosive. Nanothermite, however, can be formulated as a high explosive. It is stable when wet and can be applied like paint.
--
The presence of pre-planted explosives in the WTC buildings calls into question the official story that the buildings were destroyed by the airplane collisions and fire alone. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official government agency that investigated the building collapses, did not test for residues of explosives.
--
Richard Gage, AIA, said, “This peer-reviewed scientific study of the disturbing contents of the WTC dust is yet another smoking gun proving to the over 600 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) who I represent that a real investigation must be carried out immediately as to the actual cause of the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11.”
--
The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009,__
--
These buildings fell in exactly the same manner as a building falls which has been professionally imploded. Instead of falling down in chunky pieces and probably sideways which would have been expected had the government story actually been true, these two towers fell straight down in their "footprint" and all that steel and concrete dissolved into dust!
--
Physics fails to substantiate the government's official position that the buildings fell because they were struck by commercial airliners! This DVD, "9/11: DIRECTOR'S CUT In Plane Site" has proven the most important, and popular, of the videos produced on the attacks of 9/11. You will see some really startling truths: 1) Why did a FOX News employee report seeing no windows on Flight 175?, calling the plane NOT a commercial jetliner?
--
2) What is that pod underneath belly of both airliners crashing into WTC and did the pod cause the flash of fire just before airliner hit? 3) Listen to NYC firefighters describe the explosions they saw and heard just before WTC collapsed; 4) If both towers are still standing, what caused the huge explosion at the base of the WTC complex? Never before reported phenomenon; 5) The Physics of the Pentagon strike simply do not match up at all, plus TV feed showing onlooker saying he had seen a cruise missile strike the Pentagon; 6) Convincing evidence that planes hitting WTC were remote controlled using proven Pentagon capability; 7) Excellent feed of Oklahoma City bombing showing TV news clips where news anchors are talking about bombs going off and other bombs found, inside Murrah Building.
--
In fact, the entire government lie about the attacks on 9/11 revolve around the incredible statement which government investigators told eyewitnesses to the Oklahoma City Bombing: "You did not see what you think you saw"!
--
On the movie, "The Truman Show", the creator was asked why Truman never thought to challenge the reality of his life. The Director chillingly said, "People tend to accept the reality as it is presented to them".
--
Truer words have never been spoken. Now you know the propaganda principle upon which the attacks of 9/11.
--
FORMER MINNESOTA GOVERNOR JESSE VENTURA SAYS THE WTC COLLAPSE WAS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
--
AUSTIN, Texas, April 3 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) -- Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura blasted the official 9/11 story - citing that evidence disproves the government's claims that jet fuel melted the Twin Towers' steel girders.
--
"How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity - if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds - how can that be?" asked Ventura. "Never before in the annals of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did."
--
Ventura said he was convinced the collapses of the towers and WTC Building 7 were too similar to the controlled demolition of Las Vegas hotels. Ventura has experience with explosives from Basic Underwater Demolition SEAL training and believes unequivocally the buildings were deliberately imploded.
--
"I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes - wouldn't they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust - when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense,"
--
Ventura expressed regret that he had initially believed the official story because he could have used his power as governor to raise pointed questions in the media.
--
"I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn't go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware," said Ventura, adding that watching Loose Change at the insistence of his son was part of the catalyst for his wake up call.
--
The Governor's bold comments about 9/11 come on the heels of similar views expressed by American icon Willie Nelson during an interview on the same radio show in February.**
--
Now let's listen to Ventura say what he thought happened to the World Trade Centers:
--
Need more proof? Here's EYEWITNESS testimony offering further proof of explosions in the Twin Towers
--
__"[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."-FIREFIGHTER RICHARD BANACISKI
--
"I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?"
-ASSISTANT FIRE COMMISSIONER STEPHEN GREGORY
--
"[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
-PARAMEDIC DANIEL RIVERA
--
FDNY CAPTAIN DENNIS TARDIO, speaking of the south tower, said: "I hear an explosion and I look up. It is as if the building is being imploded, from the top floor down, one after another, boom, boom, boom."
--
In June of 2002, NBC television played segments from tapes recorded on 9/11. One segment contained the following exchange, which involved firefighters in the south tower:
--
Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've just had another explosion.
Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've had additional explosion.
Dispatcher: Received battalion command. Additional explosion.
--
Firefighter LOUIE CACCHIOLI, after entering the north tower lobby and seeing elevator doors completely blown out and people being hit with debris, asked himself, "how could this be happening so quickly if a plane hit way above"? After he reached the 24th floor, he and another fireman "heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb [and] knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator." After they pried themselves out of the elevator, "another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later . . . [and] I'm thinking, "Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here"__
--
Here are Prominent Structural Engineers who say the official Version of 9/11 is "Impossible" "Defies Common Logic" and "Violates the Law of Physics"
--
Numerous structural engineers now publicly challenge the government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11, including:
--
Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. JOERG SCHNEIDER AND DR. HUGO BACHMANN) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.
--
KAMAL S. OBEID, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
--
"Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition"
--
RONALD H. BROOKMAN, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
--
"Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the ground in about 10 seconds, pulverizing the contents into dust and ash - twice. Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds the same day? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust."
--
GRAHAM JOHN INMAN, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
--
"WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?"
--
PAUL W. MASON, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia, argues:
--
"In my view, the chances of the three buildings collapsing symmetrically into their own footprint, at freefall speed, by any other means than by controlled demolition, are so remote that there is no other plausible explanation!"
--
DAVID SCOTT, Structural Engineer, of Scotland, argues:
"Near-freefall collapse violates laws of physics. Fire induced collapse is not consistent with observed collapse mode . . . ."
--
NATHAN LOMBA, Structural Engineer, of Eureka, California, states
--
"I began having doubts about, so called, official explanations for the collapse of the WTC towers soon after the explanations surfaced. The gnawing question that lingers in my mind is: How did the structures collapse in near symmetrical fashion when the apparent precipitating causes were asymmetrical loading? The collapses defies common logic from an elementary structural engineering perspective. “If” you accept the argument that fire protection covering was damaged to such an extent that structural members in the vicinity of the aircraft impacts were exposed to abnormally high temperatures, and “if” you accept the argument that the temperatures were high enough to weaken the structural framing, that still does not explain the relatively concentric nature of the failures.
--
Neither of the official precipitating sources for the collapses, namely the burning aircraft, were centered within the floor plan of either tower; both aircraft were off-center when they finally came to rest within the respective buildings. This means that, given the foregoing assumptions, heating and weakening of the structural framing would have been constrained to the immediate vicinity of the burning aircraft. Heat transmission (diffusion) through the steel members would have been irregular owing to differing sizes of the individual members; and, the temperature in the members would have dropped off precipitously the further away the steel was from the flames—just as the handle on a frying pan doesn't get hot at the same rate as the pan on the burner of the stove. These factors would have resulted in the structural framing furthest from the flames remaining intact and possessing its full structural integrity, i.e., strength and stiffness.
--
Structural steel is highly ductile, when subjected to compression and bending it buckles and bends long before reaching its tensile or shear capacity. Under the given assumptions, “if” the structure in the vicinity of either burning aircraft started to weaken, the superstructure above would begin to lean in the direction of the burning side. The opposite, intact, side of the building would resist toppling until the ultimate capacity of the structure was reached, at which point, a weak-link failure would undoubtedly occur. Nevertheless, the ultimate failure mode would have been a toppling of the upper floors to one side—much like the topping of a tall redwood tree—not a concentric, vertical collapse.
--
For this reason alone, I rejected the official explanation for the collapse of the WTC towers out of hand. Subsequent evidence supporting controlled, explosive demolition of the two buildings are more in keeping with the observed collapse modalities and only serve to validate my initial misgivings as to the causes for the structural failures."
--
EDWARD E. KNESL, civil and structural engineer, of Phoenix, Arizona, writes:
"We design and analyze buildings for the overturning stability to resist the lateral loads with the combination of the gravity loads. Any tall structure failure mode would be a fall over to its side. It is impossible that heavy steel columns could collapse at the fraction of the second within each story and subsequently at each floor below.
--
We do not know the phenomenon of the high rise building to disintegrate internally faster than the free fall of the debris coming down from the top.
--
The engineering science and the law of physics simply doesn't know such possibility. Only very sophisticated controlled demolition can achieve such result, eliminating the natural dampening effect of the structural framing huge mass that should normally stop the partial collapse. The pancake theory is a fallacy, telling us that more and more energy would be generated to accelerate the collapse. Where would such energy would be coming from ?"
DAVID TOPETE, civil and structural engineer, San Francisco, California.
--
Here's other Structural Engineers who agree that Jet fuel DID NOT bring down the Twin Towers on 9/11 but were imploded with explosives already in the buildings:
--
CHARLES PEGELOW, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
--
DENNIS WATERTON, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin
--
WILLIAM RICE, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College:
--
There are many other structural engineers who have questioned the government's account in private. We support them and wish them courage to discuss these vital issues publicly which include:
--
MARX AYRES, A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition.
--
MILLS M. KAY MACKEY, structural engineer, of Denver, Colorado, points out:
"The force from the jets and the burning fuel could not have been sufficient to make the building collapse. Why doesn't the media mention that the 11th floor was completely immolated on February 13th, 1975? It had the weight of nearly 100 stories on top of it but it did not collapse?"
--
DWAIN A. DEETS, Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering says:
--
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].''
--
DR. STEVEN E. JONES, A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition
--
DR. CROKETT GRABBE, a U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition
--
Danish physicist BENT LUND, an expert on demolition said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives.
--
DANNY JOWENKO, A Dutch demolition expert stated that WTC 7 was imploded.
--
DR. HEIKKI KURTTILA, a safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority stated regarding WTC 7 that "The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition."
--
DR. JOEL S. HIRSCHHORN, a 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member is calling for a new investigation of 9/11
--
DR NIELS HARIT, a Danish professor of chemistry said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, "WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don't have to be a woodcutter to grasp this."
--
DR. BRUCE R. HENRY, a former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded that the Twin Towers "were brought down by planted explosives."
--
EDWARD S. MUNYAK, a mechanical engineer with 20 years experience as a Fire Protection Engineer for the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense, and Veterans Affairs, who is a contributing Subject Matter Expert to the U.S. Department of Energy Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard for Nuclear Facilities, a board member of the Northern California - Nevada Chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers, currently serving as Fire Protection Engineer for the city of San Jose, California, the 10th largest city in the United States believes that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition.
--
__ENVER MASUD, the former Chief of the Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy, and former Director of the Office of Engineering at the Public Service Commission in Washington, D.C., who is a mechanical engineer does not believe the official story, and believes that there is a prima facie case for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.
--
GARY WELZ, a professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said "The official explanation that I've heard doesn't make sense because it doesn't explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized"__
--
The photo below shows how explosives are attached to a building. It is attached at an angle so when it is detonated, the steel columns collapse into each other.
--
In this photo you see a massive steel column at ground zero from the World Trade Center and you can a the column behind the worker is sliced at an angle which is exactly what is used in professional demolitions.**
--
We highly recommend the following website where you can read testimonies of:
--
Patriots Question 9/11
--
__190+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials, question 9/11
--
670+ Engineers and Architects, question 9/11
--
200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals, question 9/11
--
400+ Professors Question 9/11
--
230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members, question 9/11
--
200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals, question 9/11__
--
All question the Official Story of 9/11:
--
Patriots Question 9/11
--
AMERICA! WHAT MORE PROOF DO YOU NEED? WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO GET SICK AND TIRED OF THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED MEDIA KEEP TELLING YOU THE OSAMA/ARAB LIE ABOUT 9/11? WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO DEMAMD THAT YOU ARE TOLD THE TRUTH AND HOLD THOSE REALLY RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTABLE?
--
EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM;
-
